During the last few decades there
are some silly questions and comments, based on not much more than assumption, which
always seem to come up. I’ve always been amazed when company representatives
encounter a well-qualified and, okay yeah, occasionally over-qualified
applicant interested in their job opportunities. Most often they reflexively reject or at the
very least instantly view them with suspicion.
More Pavlovian than a logical response,
it is sometimes legitimate, but making a snap judgment without any due
consideration is nuts and, frankly, pretty stupid in my less-than humble
opinion. I am referring to some, not all, managers in this blog and a
dereliction of their responsibilities to their company - as I see it.
If a manager happens upon an
exceptionally qualified person who’s sincerely interested in the job - even
after emphasizing they may be overqualified for the job position in question and
yet they are still eager and interested - then why not drive on and continue
with the process and, if they are your best choice, hire that person and be
thankful for the blessing that walked through your door. That is, of course, if
you are, in fact, seeking to hire the best available
talent.
I’ve seen too many environments
staffed by less than impressive people who just go along to get along – and
apparently, management is just fine with it judging by their inaction. Then, when
an opportunity avails itself and someone who is clearly a notch above seeks an
opportunity, many hiring managers will make short-sighted and weak excuses
like, “Well you know, Michael, we think they might not fit our team here and
could be disruptive to the team (status quo).” For expediency and their own
sake, they’re just fine with the bar lowered and would rather hire in
comparison with the strongest of the weak among their employees. Perhaps, and
this is just a wild thought on my part, a potential disrupter is exactly what
they need. However, more managers than ever lack any imagination, because if
something doesn’t go right, they might actually have to explain themselves –
clearly leadership and innovation is no longer encouraged in companies based on
this obvious trend.
When I introduce a candidate and
know in my own heart of hearts, as well as my 23 years of professional
experience, they should be happy to find someone better than what they seek who
is, regardless, willing to consider the job, they say, “But Michael, within a
few months they will want more money…” or, here is the dumbest excuse of them all, “They’ll only stay until something
better comes along.”
Hey, News Flash!!! – Everyone leaves
when something better comes along, hello!
- including managers uttering that nonsense with a straight face. Indeed, people
do attach some loyalty to good managers and employers so long as they see a
reason to stay, but everyone with any measure of ambition will move on to a new
opportunity – eventually.
For those managers who possess
real leadership abilities, who are forward thinking and don’t lack self-confidence,
hiring someone who may be viewed as over-qualified can be quite a catch,
especially if they are managed well. Indeed, bring on someone of a higher
caliber than some other current employees and team members; yeah, a few of the
underwhelming who feel the heat of standing near someone who provides contrast might
leave as a result. Then celebrate, because they’ve affected change for the
better. It’s the bi-product of Top-Grading, you know that nearly forgotten term
downplayed by those who don’t measure up themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment