When I look at the
changing trends that have taken place since I became a headhunter in 1992, the
most notable is the advent and increased reliance on technology that is
supplanting traditional human interaction.
One of the areas
where it is most evident, for me, is the job application and interview process.
The downside is the obvious degradation of soft skills and interpersonal
communication abilities of all involved in the hiring process. For all of the
technology at our fingers tips, which is indeed useful and necessary, our
abilities to communicate are suffering. When it comes to interacting directly
with other people; when we can’t hide behind our devices, we’re more
uncomfortable and awkward than ever. And when I do speak with some people what
comes out of their mouths has little relevance. Increasingly they speak in
generic terms and are not really saying much of anything.
Job seekers are
increasingly clueless about the most basic tasks of presenting themselves and
demonstrating to hiring managers why they should be chosen for a job, instead
of someone else. Even worse, those who are tasked with interviewing, evaluating
and selecting those whom they need to hire are not much better. They
increasingly will do anything to avoid face-to-face interaction with applicants
until it is absolutely necessary. Sure, they can say all they want about
technology saving time, efficiency and indeed I do believe that was the
original intent. But now, the time saving tools have become a crutch, a barrier
to hide behind so they don’t have to actually meet people or worse, have to speak with them! It’s getting so bad
that many decision makers increasingly lack confidence in their own conclusions
without some tech tool telling them, “its okay, go ahead”.
The handshake and
initial face-to-face screening interview has been replaced with a Skype call.
But as that is not really a meeting nor is it an opportunity to get to know
you, you’ll need to take a psychometric evaluation to understand what motivates
you to determine your suitability, as well as to look for red flags and warning
signs. They could of course meet you and ask, trusting in their own instincts
but that might take up too much of their precious time. Later, if you are determined
to be suitable when measured against their metrics, they’ll finally meet you -
to discuss the results. I wonder if this method of making a decision based on a
test actually results in better hires, better employee retention and less
turnover and fewer bad hires, because many companies are paying a lot of money
to evaluate that which they are no longer capable of doing on their own. But I
am sure the companies that produce all the software we over-rely upon, that
makes modern hiring possible, have plenty of marketing evidence to show without
their wares, competent decisions just cannot be made.
Their propaganda
aside, all the software tools and excuses can only delay the inevitable and at
some point they have to meet you and likewise, you’ll have to meet them. Are
you prepared? Are you able to do that which no software program can as yet
replace, that being your ability to articulate why you should be the person
selected for a job for which you’re qualified? It might seem like a small thing
and many people fail to consider it, but from my perspective witnessing the
trends of the last couple decades, being a good communicator, possessing better
than average soft skills provides you with more of an edge than you may have
previously thought.
It is amazing when
one considers that only 50 years ago, industry thrived and economies were
strong, decisions were made before the advent of widespread computer use. Most
managers lacked college degrees too. I wonder how they managed to do it - but I
digress.
If you lack
confidence in your ability to communicate, there is no software that will help
you to improve. You can only improve your skills the old-fashioned way, by
removing your face from whatever screen it’s buried in, getting out there among
people, better developing your skills to interact with others.