I always suggest that no single method or style works all the time and one must self-evaluate periodically in order to make changes to one's efforts. I would be a hypocrite if I did not also practice what I preach. This, the third month of my blog, I’ve determined to make an adjustment to my own efforts. Until now I have had a forums page with different subjects I thought might be of interest and, although I have received a lot of emails commenting on the subjects I have listed, nobody has wanted to post comments, for whatever reason. Regardless, I am taking advantage of the slow period between Christmas and the New Year's celebration. So, as an administrative note, I have decided to remove the forums page and encourage direct commentary in response to my twice-weekly entries. I will recommence and post my next entry on Thursday, the 3rd of January with a topic on the minds of many, when they consider their resolutions and what they hope for in the year ahead.
Friday, December 28, 2012
Thursday, December 20, 2012
When You Resign – What if Your Current Boss Doesn’t Want to Let You Go?
If you received a signed job offer, congratulations by the way, all that is left to do is resign from your current and soon to be old job – easy, right? Well, it‘s not always so simple. Unless you hate your job and you think your boss is a jerk, resigning is not so easy if you want to leave on good terms. You do want to leave on good terms; in the future you’ll need references and you don’t want to exit with the equivalent to showing your middle finger on your way out the door. The reaction of your boss could vary, but I want to discuss only two possibilities; whether they accept your resignation, or they do not want to accept your resignation. I see no need to discuss any unpleasant reactions you may experience, because such a situation will further validate your decision to leave anyway.
If you’ve been a good employee, have you considered your boss may not want to let you go so easily? He might, at the very least, ask you to reconsider and remain where you are. Perhaps they may even attempt to entice you to stay with a counter–offer and why not? Companies don‘t like to lose good and productive employees. Often it‘s harder and more expensive for companies to find a similarly qualified and effective replacement than it is to do what might be necessary to keep you. While you likely don’t have any negative feelings toward your current boss, you just want to resign and get it over with so you can move on. You schedule a meeting and communicate your resignation and, surprise, he or she is reluctant to accept your departure plans and they don’t want you to leave. You may not experience this but, if you do and your intention is indeed to leave for a new job, you should be prepared for the resignation drill.
I’ve witnessed many different reasons suggested to people about why they should reconsider or delay a decision to leave. It is possible they really don‘t want you to leave. Likewise, you‘ve probably caught your boss unprepared, so his initial reaction is to buy time and put off this conversation. As a result, you could be asked to delay and hold that thought until they look into what can be done to keep you and prevent you from leaving. Sometimes it is legitimate, but is also just as often meant to buy some time, so your boss can then talk to their boss and determine how best to deal with the sudden news. At this moment, whether or not they really want you to stay is a secondary concern for your boss. So, let’s be real and avoid pessimism, let’s be positive. When it’s time to resign, don’t just walk up to your boss and ask to speak with them at that moment, ask for an appointment or a time when they are available. If they prevaricate, suggest it is an important matter about which you’d like to speak privately. Sure, they may suspect there is a problem, but this is not something to discuss in the hallway or in the presence of others. If, when you resign, they will accept your decision, both sides can shake hands and wish each other luck. However, if it does not go smoothly, be prepared to deal with counter–offers or other surprises.
If you are worried, if you are concerned you don’t have the resolve, or feel pangs of guilt about resigning, consider this; if your boss had a new opportunity, do you think he would think twice or let anyone hold him or her back?
Monday, December 17, 2012
So It’s a Little Farther Away - What’s the Problem?
For whatever
reason, perhaps the available jobs in your local vicinity are either not
suitable or there may be few available. Let’s say, hypothetically, there is a
job you are considering, you like them and they like you. They are willing to
pay more money, but there is a two hour or longer one-way commute on a clear
weather and good traffic day. However, it is a good job and the kind for which
you have been looking, so you think beyond the commute issue, instead
considering the good things and benefits for you and your family.
I’ve witnessed
this sort of situation and, most often, accepting these circumstances is
rationalized by focusing on the good or because of need, although I do warn
candidates of the negatives to which they should give more credence. Everything
starts out well, but often it isn’t long before I receive a call from the
candidate who accepted the job, telling me they are unhappy, never home and the
increased money they are earning is swallowed up by fuel and occasional hotel
costs, when there is a snow storm or a late night at the office.
This distance of
the commute could be such that it does not make sense to sell your house and
relocate with all that includes, such as uprooting children, etc. A long
commute can take its toll in many ways you may not have anticipated; not least
of which is the total time you are commuting to and fro, combined with the time
at work. This could mean, as an example, a four hours or more total commute time
added to your work day, which is likely more than just 8 hours. If you’re
lucky, you are still looking at a minimum of 12 hours per day and that doesn’t
even account for bad weather, highway construction delays or spontaneous
traffic snarls.
If you find
yourself in such a situation, you must give equal consideration to the negative
aspects of such a lifestyle change. It’s easy to justify the good things. I
also assume most people recognize relocation should be the logical conclusion,
once you’ve settled into the job. Indeed, I know some people who do the long
distance marriage thing and see each other on weekends, if their company will
pay the expense or pay enough to make that an option. We’re all different, but
most people cannot live like this long term without it impacting their personal
relationships. If you’re single, perhaps it isn’t a big deal, but you should
not overlook the financial costs vs. benefits and remember that your time has value
that is measurable, both in monetary and quality-of-life terms.
Considering relocation?
If you are
young, single and mobile and would consider relocation, now is the time to do
it, before you are weighed down with responsibilities that increase as we age
and progress throughout our careers. If you have a family, before engaging in
an interview process and absolutely before any final decisions, have a
discussion with your spouse and your family. I recall early in my recruiting
career, when I was working with a candidate who had shown interest in a
position requiring relocation from Minneapolis
to Atlanta . The
opportunity was with a good multinational company selling medical capital
equipment to hospitals. The first interview had gone well and there was
interest in inviting the candidate back for a second meeting. When I asked him
how his wife and family would feel about moving to another part of the country,
he replied it would not be a problem. Upon the successful completion of the
second interview, the hiring manager informed me this candidate was his favorite
and they wanted to invite him back for a third round. If that went well, they
were prepared to make the candidate an offer, although, beforehand, they would need to be sure the candidate
would indeed relocate if the job was offered to him. Up to that point, I hadn’t
yet been able to definitively pin down the candidate’s commitment on the
subject, and the most I could get from him was that when the time came, his
wife and kids would move with him. That still was not the answer my client
required. So, I agreed with the hiring manager there would be no written job offer until we could
clear up this issue. I needed to establish if he was serious and with real
intent – or was he jerking us around? I decided to call him again about it, but
instead took advantage of an opportunity when his wife answered. She thanked me
for representing her husband, and said he was very excited about the potential
new job, and that she fully supported her husband’s efforts. So I asked her how
she felt about moving to Atlanta .
There was long silence before she confirmed what I had suspected; her husband
had not told her relocation was involved and that she absolutely would not support a move away from her family
or her childrens' grandparents! I thanked her for her time and from that moment
the deal was dead. Fortunately for me, I switched to a secondary candidate I
was also representing who won the selection process and relocated from eastern Pennsylvania . If there
are other people who will be required to accompany any relocation you might
consider, then it is never a solitary decision.
Feel free to
discuss this post in the forum(no registration required).
Thursday, December 13, 2012
I Want to Think About it
This phrase is often used when someone receives a job offer
and would like to consider it before committing themselves. They may first want
to discuss it with their family, or perhaps they simply want to step back and
take a breath before saying yes (or no). And why not, what’s wrong with taking
some time to consider a job offer? However, the question for how long comes to mind for the people who’ve been directly
involved in the hiring process. How you conduct yourself at this time can
ultimately influence their perceptions of you, even before you arrive for your
first day of work.
As a headhunter, often a delayed decision tells me there
may be other issues influencing the timing of how long someone takes to
consider whether they will either accept or decline a job offer. Asking for
more than 24 to 48 hours, in my view, is counter-productive and not helpful.
The reason for your delay could be that the seriousness of the situation has
become very real to you. Until now, you may have been so immersed in the
process and your efforts, that it’s caught you a little off-guard. But there
may be other reasons. Possibly, you are involved in another process and are
hoping to wait for results so you can have the luxury of choosing between two
offers before making a decision. If you don’t already have another offer, it’s
too late. Be careful what you wish for, if you have an offer you were seeking,
it is decision time. When delays occur after a job seeker has been so eager and
ambitious, only to now need more than
a reasonable amount of time, I am suspicious. If I feel this way, you can bet
an employer will as well. I’ve actually heard people say they need a couple
weeks to think about it. Really? This
may sound a little brutal and insensitive, but if someone says they want more
than a few days to consider whether or not they will accept a job offer, I
naturally assume they are not serious. I switch into cynical mode and think
they are playing games and ultimately they have no real interest. Let’s
backtrack a moment; when I work with a candidate, I ask them throughout the
interview process if they are involved in any other processes and, if they’ve
said no, I’m concerned about the reason for a lengthy delay.
When I represent a job seeker I instruct them that, unless
there is a circumstance preventing them from making a decision, they should
answer within 24 to 48 hours, maximum.
Likewise, I generally advise my clients to withdraw
and take away the job offer, if a candidate demands an unreasonable length of
time without good reason. As far as I am concerned, this demonstrates a lack of
sincerity and here’s why; if both sides, the company and the candidate, have
completed the interview process and have had all their questions and concerns
addressed, why then is a lengthy span of time needed to decide? In other words,
knowing what you know today about the job
offer with all your questions satisfactorily answered, what will you know in a
week or two weeks that you do not already know today or tomorrow? If, on
the other hand, there is a new concern or lingering question, then address it now and make your decision.
Remember, I previously suggested you verbally accept,
pending the written offer, as a means of symbolically closing the process to
others. Well, pull a stunt like asking for a lengthy time before providing your
decision, can begin a steadily diminishing level of interest in you. They may
now find it wise to call that back-up candidate for the job. Personally I see
it as an opportunity when a company, with whom I am not yet working, says they have an open position but they’ve
already chosen someone, although the person they want to hire needs a few weeks
(or longer) to decide. If a written offer has not yet been presented or signed,
I suggest they should meet my candidate before a final decision is made. On a
few occasions, my candidate got the job out from under someone who was slow and
not as serious. If you’ve received the offer it’s decision time. If you don’t
want the job, professionally decline. However, if there are no remaining issues
and you want the job - stop messin’
around and take it, or step aside.
Feel free to
discuss this post in the forum(no registration required).
Monday, December 10, 2012
Senseless Online Networking Mistakes - Always Assume Someone is Watching
Yeah, I know, it sounds a bit
paranoid, but many people fail to come to grips with the fact that one of the
simplest ways for a company to conduct a reference check on you is a Google
search and all that can be found so easily. I am not talking about your
professional presence, but rather the open window into your personal world -
often a bit too personal. What will they find? Most of us are online, and
social networking enables us to stay in contact with friends and family,
express opinions and so much more. Living on another continent, it allows me
fast and direct contact.
However, many people post without
even a second thought. Sure, it can be very entertaining for you and your friends,
but companies are watching or they have the means to check what you are up to
at any time they choose – whether they tell you or not. The same goes for your
company email and computer usage. The percentage of time people are online
during work hours, conducting personal activities is staggering. You’ll likely
get away with it, and most do, but when a company chooses to select someone to
scrutinize, the employee has provided them with the ammunition to use against
them. For example, I strongly recommend if a person wants me, a headhunter, to
assist them they should never send me anything nor conduct communications with
the work-related email address. I am even careful about text messages. I know
of international law firms – yeah, I said law firms, who monitor their
employees' mobile phone activities. And do you think they are the only
perpetrators? Is it illegal, yep, but that doesn’t stop it from happening and
you are naïve if you think those tools are not, or will not be used. One
obvious use against an employee I can think of relates to bonuses. I know of
organizations looking for reasons not to pay out bonus money due an employee –
especially someone who is leaving their employer for another job. They look for
an excuse such as misuse of company equipment and non-work related online
activity, especially activity related to looking for a new job or sending
resumes. Most companies have rules about personal use of company equipment and,
later, people act surprised when the rules are actually enforced. Furthermore,
when a person leaves their job a company routinely scans laptops when they are
turned in; what will they find on yours? I’m not suggesting you should never
use a company computer or email account for anything personal, but use your
head and consider what-if?
Another consideration is the
reference check to which I referred. It’s just so easy to express oneself that
we don’t even think about it. The same technologies that give us freedom of
expression can also chain you to what you’ve posted. Run a Google search and
let’s say you are on Facebook, most people are, unless your profile is set to
private you’ve left the door wide open. If you haven’t posted anything you’d be
worried people might see, so be it. But some people provide way too much
information for whatever reason. Here’s an example; I know a guy, and he’s a
nice person, and whatever mood he’s in he shares with everyone he knows. For
instance:
“…now i
dont have jack s**t. A crappy 32 hr a week job (supposed to be full time) goofy
hours (couldnt even have a life if i had money to) almost 4 bucks an hour less
pay. dont have money to even buy a decent set of
shoes. trying hard to not get the utilities shut off. bustin my a** on side
jobs just to pay rent. i wonder why i even bother anymore. give up on life..
go on welfare.. start drinking and smoking pot and just numb myself till it
doesnt matter anymore.”
I cleaned it up a little bit with
the asterisks because, after all, this is a family blog. Sadly, the poster of
the comment / rant is an intelligent, clever and talented individual. My
reaction is, “what is he thinking?” I know someone might say “Hey, Michael, I
will say what I want, when I want and it’s nobody’s business!” Well, yes it is,
and you willfully chose to make it that way. Ironically, lots of people post
stuff like this without a second thought and I can find 10 more like it with
little effort. Perhaps the individual who authored those comments would not be
happy I’m re-posting it on my blog but, too late, they’ve already been hung out
there for all to see and it’s now public information, in a public domain.
Okay, so let me ask you, if you
are considering hiring an applicant and during a reference check, find the
passage I noted above along with other similar entries demonstrating a pattern,
would you hire this person? Furthermore, even if you were a friend and you
wanted to help this person, would you be willing to recommend this person?
Further yet, if it is someone who is going through a difficult time and
frustrated that they can’t find a better job or someone to hire them, are they
not self-inflicting damage to their efforts? And lastly, what happens if his
current employer reads it? Even if later his mood shifts and he’s the happiest
person around, will it matter if his past self-expression is noted by a company
that might have chosen to hire him?
I’m not telling anyone how they
should behave and I am also active on Facebook and other social media. However,
I haven’t an ounce of pity for anybody who would sabotage themselves and then
complain about how unfair the world is. The extent of how little personal
privacy we have, considering all the technology at our fingertips, is an
ongoing debate. However, you cannot complain if you hand someone reasons to
disqualify you as a job applicant – or affect your own current employment
status. Think before you click - on this subject a little paranoia is good
common sense.
Feel free to discuss this post in the forum(no registration required).
Thursday, December 6, 2012
What’s Your Hurry?
Whether you need a job or there
is a mitigating factor causing you to find a new one, it’s a higher priority
for you than for most anyone else and the process usually moves slower than you
like, or need. The more urgently you need and want a job, the more lethargic
the pace feels. In fact, “urgency” is the key word for this blog entry, and
it’s the level of urgency a company places on filling the position, which will
dictate the fluidity leading to any job offer. Sometimes we get lucky and
experience a shared synchronicity, when both you and the company are in the
right place at the right time, with a mutually beneficial happy ending. But
this is the exception more than the rule and one side or the other usually
drags their feet for whatever reason.
We assume all posted and
advertised jobs are of an urgent nature, otherwise why would they be listed,
right? But for a variety of reasons the processes are often slow and plod along
appearing aimless. Even now during the sluggish economy, companies are hiring
but they are taking longer to do and many have added a step before making final
decisions. Although the most common reasons for delays are either bureaucratic
in nature, poor communication between those running the process, or lack of
time due to conflicting schedules of those whose participation is necessary. I
am actually amazed some well known companies can even manage to conduct
business according to how chaotic and dysfunctional their hiring processes are.
I can name a couple of companies I am aware of right now that tell me they have
open positions for critical roles they need filled ASAP and, yet, in both cases
it’s been over 7 weeks without any definitive decisions and thus far they’ve only
conducted one round of interviews. Well apparently, somewhere along the line
there is someone who doesn’t think it’s an urgent matter.
Until you are invited for an
interview of any type, there isn’t much you can do but to keep your options as
open as possible. Until you have a signed offer in your hand, you should always
keep looking and interviewing for other positions, no matter what kind of
assurances you get from any company with whom you’ve met. Keep looking for and
chasing other opportunities. When you attend a first round interview, add to
your list of questions for the interviewer, “What is the urgency level to fill
this position?” or, “How quickly do you want to hire for this position?” The
answer to this question can help you a lot. Often people leave an interview
feeling as if they provided a lot of info but didn’t learn much more after the
meeting than they knew beforehand. If this happens to you, it is most often your
own fault if, for whatever reason, you failed to ask questions enabling you to
make a better informed decision during the interview process.
For example: they may tell you it
is not a high priority position, in which case you can better manage your
efforts chasing other opportunities. As a participant in the hiring process,
you have every right to know this information. If they give you some attitude
as a result, unless you are desperate, you can better consider if this is the
kind of environment in which you want to work. In other cases they will say
they are looking but waiting until they find the right person, which is a
non-answer but at least you’ll give it an effort. In the best situation they
may alternatively share with you a heightened level of need to fill the
position and, meanwhile, this is yet another factor that will set you apart
from the others who just asked about the job description and not much more.
Looking at it from their perspective, who will they think has more on the ball,
you or others who limit themselves to asking only about title, duties and money.
Whenever I speak to a client or
potential client I always check for the level of urgency and, if they tell me
there’s no hurry but they’d like to hire within 6 months, I tell them I’ll
follow up in 4 when it’s a higher priority and there will be something to talk
about. There’s no sense in wasting time now when I can be pursuing other things
more urgent in nature. In the meantime, I channel my efforts with things more
immediate or urgent and move less timely items to the back burner until or
unless something changes. Many job seekers start smart by pursuing multiple
opportunities, but along the way they often end up making the mistake of
prematurely focusing and narrowing in on one in particular and neglecting, then
forgetting their other simultaneous efforts. If it ends up the job you chose on
which to focus, while neglecting others, turns out to have been more of a job
wish than a job opportunity you’ll be back to square one scrambling to find
those other options you allowed to fall to the way side. Until you have an
offer in your hand and a start date, do not stop looking at multiple
opportunities.
Feel free to discuss this post in the forum(no registration required).
Monday, December 3, 2012
You Want the Truth?
In the workplace, as well as
during the interview process, honesty is something most dare not speak due to
the easily offended. Utter the truth and likely you’ll be exposed to ridicule
and derision. With the potent combination of political correctness and a
litigious society, who wants to stick out their neck. For example, after
McDonald’s was sued by a patron who spilled hot coffee onto their own lap a few
years ago, instead of monetarily rewarding their stupidity, the honest response to a lawsuit should have been to
offer them a lifetime supply of coffee served in a two-handed sippy cup with
instructions and a bib. I’m sure many more agree with me than are willing to
admit it, truthfully. Not only are people increasingly reluctant to speak
honestly, many can’t handle the kick of full-strength 100 Proof honesty and,
instead, prefer only a very watered-down version for fear of any deleterious
side-effect, such as an occasionally necessary reality check. A Jack Nicholson
script line comes to mind. But I digress, as I often do.
Even providing a truthful, yet
poor, job reference without first considering the potential liability risk is a
modern consideration. So I understand it may be an oxymoron to suggest you
should actively seek constructive criticism from a hiring manager, following an
interview process in which you were not selected to progress forward. If you
feel it was the result of a miscommunication or misunderstanding you can ask to
be reconsidered. Failing that, I think it is wise to suggest you’d like to
learn the reason(s) for why you were not selected in order to help you to help
yourself in the future. For many of the reasons I have mentioned, they might
choose to avoid the subject, but anytime there is an opportunity for this kind
of feedback, it's valuable information. Take what you can get and thank them.
Occasionally I speak with job
applicants who tell me they do well in interviews but, on more than one
occasion when they reached the semi-finals, alas, they weren’t selected. To my
mind, if there is a pattern like this, you must determine what the problem is
and address ways to make an adjustment or correction going forward.
It’s never easy to give people
bad news although it’s a part of my job. It’s also a routine part of my job to
debrief hiring officials for details regarding why or why not to move an
applicant forward. Over the years I’ve observed there are five basic reasons as
to why people stumble:
- Unreasonable demands – When it comes time to discuss the compensation package or benefits some people are simply unreasonable in their demands, i.e. money benefits, etc. Remedy: Look around and understand what the market will bear. There is a difference in what is an acceptable demand during better economic times and now – it’s just the way it is. Have a plan A & B; for compensation, for example, determine the money you’d like to earn and the money you need, which are usually two different numbers, and be satisfied with landing anywhere in between.
- Misrepresentation – Sometimes people inflate their qualifications on the resumes a bit too much or, in some rare cases, a misguided soul just flat-out lies. None of these Mittyesque situations end well - even if a person somehow slips through and gets hired they always get nailed. Remedy: First and foremost, be factual about your experience and the depth of it. Regarding your experience, the key is to have enough info to tease, but hold back and don’t use all your ammo until you meet face-to-face, and then knock their socks off. Undersell and over deliver and not the other way around.
- Unsuitable – Sometimes you just don’t fit the bill, you’re not the right match or you were not able to convince them of how your slightly different skills are transferable and applicable to the role for which you applied. In this case, no matter how good your attitude, it ain’t enough. Remedy: Don’t play Russian Roulette or Pin-the-Tail on the Donkey with your job search efforts, it only wastes your time and that of others. Be able to connect your transferable skills and experience with what they are looking for and be able to convincingly explain why you are a suitable choice.
- Poor interview prep – Whatever the excuse, be it a lack of time to prep or maybe a lack of motivation, there is no reason to fail to prep, it only takes about 30 minutes to an hour and easy access to the Internet deflates any excuse not to do so.
- Poor presentation skills – sometimes those with more than adequate experience and skills just plain stink when it comes time to explain to someone why they are the best person for the job. Sometimes it’s nerves as a result of shyness or when the spotlight’s on them. Other times it’s ignorance because, let’s face it, most of us don’t interview often enough to be proficient. Remedy: Practice at literal or mental role playing. Make an effort to improve your skills. BTW, I have a book filled with this stuff and I am confident everyone will learn something from it.
Of the five, the last two are the most common missteps. As an example, there was a very sharp professional specialist I coached who, when asked to describe his claim of being an effective project manager, replied, “I don’t know how to describe it but just trust me, I know what I am doing and I am very good at it.” At that moment, I knew his chances for further consideration died with that reply; that kind of response isn’t good enough, ever. On the other hand, this an easy thing to remedy in the future. When you can receive feedback from someone willing to be honest with “constructive” criticism, sometimes bad news is really good news, depending on what you do with the information – be grateful and thank them! Even so, it still comes back to you and you are your own best resource. Occasionally stop to review what’s working or what is not and make the necessary adjustments.
Feel free to discuss this post in the forum(no registration required).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)